Re: using explicit_bzero

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: using explicit_bzero
Date: 2019-06-23 19:55:47
Message-ID: 26f25674-9c4d-241f-0e74-3fee9860ca13@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-06-21 15:25, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> +#ifndef HAVE_EXPLICIT_BZERO
>> +#define explicit_bzero(b, len) bzero(b, len)
>> +#endif
>
> This presumes that every platform has bzero, which is unsafe (POSIX
> doesn't specify it) and is an assumption we kicked to the curb a dozen
> years ago (067a5cdb3). Please use memset() for the substitute instead.

OK, done.

> Also, I'm a bit suspicious of using AC_CHECK_FUNCS for this; that
> generally Doesn't Work for anything that's not a vanilla out-of-line
> function. Are we worried about people implementing this as a macro,
> compiler built-in, etc?

I think we should address that if we actually find such a case.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-06-23 19:56:40 Re: using explicit_bzero
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2019-06-23 19:48:26 Re: Choosing values for multivariate MCV lists