| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
| Date: | 2016-05-12 11:12:43 |
| Message-ID: | 26c2bfe2-9b76-fe64-f696-5244b1ae8315@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 5/12/16 4:23 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> Hmm, my bad. Seems like what I thought was a long-standing practice
> was long forgotten. FYI, here's where it was established:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/200007280252(dot)WAA05977(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us#200007280252(dot)WAA05977@candle.pha.pa.us
> (many, many years ago - man I feel old!).
>
> The resulting change to purge the docs (of the then single reference
> to an external app) was in 530dc73cd18f4df708c0c998521a20f5f93f729a.
What was removed then was the *man page* of pgadmin.
Earlier in that thread, someone said:
"It's certainly nice to mention related products, but maybe a reference
page is not the most appropriate form"
which someone later interpreted as an incentive to a purge. :-/
I think these principles still apply today, and most in this thread
appear to agree: Mention tools in the right context.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2016-05-12 11:34:06 | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-05-12 08:31:49 | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |