| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken |
| Date: | 2017-06-19 07:55:07 |
| Message-ID: | 269f5daa-54a0-77e5-c328-49b9a3602cfb@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/06/19 7:59, Andrew Gierth wrote:
>>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> > (Any preferences for whether it should be one commit or 3 separate ones?)
For my 2c, it would be nice to keep at least the inheritance one (or all
of them actually) separate.
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-06-19 08:30:12 | Re: Refreshing subscription relation state inside a transaction block |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-06-19 07:41:23 | Re: Phantom segment upon promotion causing troubles. |