Re: PostgreSQL db

Hi Kevin,

Thanks for the prompt reply.

May I know the machine configuration esp. the hardware configuration that you used for this setup?

Thanks
Amit

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: "Amit Sharma" <asharma(at)verts(dot)co(dot)in>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 10:28:10 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL db

Amit Sharma <asharma(at)verts(dot)co(dot)in> wrote:

> Hope I am not bothering you by sending this email.  I had some
> query regarding Postgres & while doing research online I got your
> reference. We are using OpenERP an opensource ERP system. For one
> installation it require that there will be 3000 simultaneous
> users accessing OpenERP server, hence same requests will come to
> PostgreSQL server.  And daily 500,000 (Half million)records will
> be added that means 15,000,000 (15 Million) a month.
>
> Can Postgres handle 3000 simultaneous requests and handled
> 15million records addition month on month basis. With this growth
> can Postgresql handle the volume for next 10 years or so? Any
> recommendation on Server configuration; we will be using Amazon
> Cloud.

People often run much larger volumes than this on PostgreSQL, but
generally not without using connection pooling.

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Number_Of_Database_Connections

Personally, I managed a machine which typically had 3000 users
running queries against it while about 20 million
INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statements per day were run against it.
Tuning showed best performance when we used connection pools with
35 connections for read-only queries and 6 connections for the DML.

Expect to spend some time adjusting the configuration for your
particular hardware and workload.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com