| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | nelson-m-marques(at)ext(dot)ptinovacao(dot)pt, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsqlrpms-hackers(at)pgfoundry(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #6341: Packaging - virtual provides "postgres" without version |
| Date: | 2011-12-23 17:46:55 |
| Message-ID: | 26941.1324662415@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:27 AM, <nelson-m-marques(at)ext(dot)ptinovacao(dot)pt> wrote:
>> Currently your binary distribution of PostgreSQL for Enterprise Linux has a
>> virtual provides for 'postgresql' which has no version associated with it
>> (there's good and bad things depending on usage regarding this
>> methodology).
> The PostgreSQL project doesn't have any direct control over Red Hat's
> spec files, although Tom Lane, a PostgreSQL core team member, also
> works at Red Hat. I would suggest that you take this up with Red Hat
> directly...
There is no such Provides: in the Red Hat spec files, so I would assume
that this complaint is actually about the PGDG RPMs. Devrim?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-12-23 18:58:41 | Re: user names & non-ASCII |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-12-23 17:25:31 | Re: BUG #6340: to_timestamp() miscalculates |