Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Date: 2010-06-28 14:19:09
Message-ID: 26936.1277734749@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 21:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sorry, I've been a bit distracted by other responsibilities (libtiff
>> security issues for Red Hat, if you must know). I'll get on it shortly.

> I don't think the PostgreSQL project should wait any longer on this. If
> it does we risk loss of quality in final release, assuming no slippage.

It will get done. It is not the very first thing on my to-do list.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-06-28 14:48:05 Re: get_whatever_oid, part 1: object types with unqualifed names
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-06-28 14:08:55 Re: pg_dump's checkSeek() seems inadequate