Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL Benchmarks)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jon Griffin" <jon(at)jongriffin(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL Benchmarks)
Date: 2003-02-11 18:01:13
Message-ID: 26924.1044986473@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

"Jon Griffin" <jon(at)jongriffin(dot)com> writes:
> So it appears that linux at least is way above your 8 meg point, unless I
> am missing something.

Yeah, AFAIK all recent Linuxen are well above the range of parameters
that I was suggesting (and even if they weren't, Linux is particularly
easy to change the SHMMAX setting on). It's other Unixoid platforms
that are likely to have a problem. Particularly the ones where you
have to rebuild the kernel to change SHMMAX; people may be afraid to
do that.

Does anyone know whether cygwin has a setting comparable to SHMMAX,
and if so what is its default value? How about the upcoming native
Windows port --- any issues there?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-02-11 18:03:45 Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: [pgsql-advocacy]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-11 17:54:37 Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re:

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-02-11 18:03:45 Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: [pgsql-advocacy]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-11 17:54:37 Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re:

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-02-11 18:03:45 Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: [pgsql-advocacy]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-11 17:54:37 Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re: