| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | Andrew Bartley <abartley(at)evolvosystems(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: temp table indexes | 
| Date: | 2002-03-19 06:29:12 | 
| Message-ID: | 26918.1016519352@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Andrew Bartley wrote:
>> The testing I have already done, an index is by far better in this
>> circumstance.
> If it is a non-temp table with the same data and VACUUM ANALYZE, does it
> use an index?
The default stats values used in the absence of any VACUUM are supposed
to yield an index search.  Temp-ness is irrelevant.  For example:
regression=# create temp table foo (f1 int primary key);
NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'foo_pkey' for table 'foo'
CREATE
regression=# explain select * from foo where f1 = 42;
INFO:  QUERY PLAN:
Index Scan using foo_pkey on foo  (cost=0.00..4.82 rows=1 width=4)
  indxqual: (f1 = 42)
EXPLAIN
I'd be interested to see the details of Andrew's example where this
does not happen.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Enote | 2002-03-19 07:00:50 | is postgres IP address sensitive? | 
| Previous Message | Andrew Bartley | 2002-03-19 06:01:37 | Re: temp table indexes |