Re: BEFORE UPDATE Triggers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <jan(at)black-lion(dot)info>
Cc: Chris Anderson <cva(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BEFORE UPDATE Triggers
Date: 2003-08-30 21:56:27
Message-ID: 2691.1062280587@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Jan Wieck <jan(at)black-lion(dot)info> writes:
> Unfortunately, you're right. There is no way do distinguish in a trigger
> or rule if a value in the new row did result from the UPDATE query or
> from target list expansion with OLD values.

> It would not be terribly hard to examine the original query during
> executor start, looking for bare OLD referencing Var nodes, and stick
> something like a flag array into the trigger information.

People keep suggesting this, but I've never thought it was a very sane
idea. What if some BEFORE trigger upstream of yours changes the column?
You won't find that out unless you actually compare the OLD and NEW
column values. If you assume the column has not changed just because
the original query text didn't change it, you are in for a world of hurt.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2003-08-31 01:16:26 Re: Getting the return type right for SETOF
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2003-08-30 20:59:40 Re: Getting the return type right for SETOF