Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl
Date: 2023-01-30 10:48:45
Message-ID: 268fd337-8bb7-92e6-0da2-416c022c11f3@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27.01.23 03:59, Michael Paquier wrote:
> At the end, that would be unnoticeable for the average user, I guess,
> but here are the numbers I get on my laptop :)

Personally, I think we do not want the two jumble methods in parallel.

Maybe there are other opinions.

I'm going to set this thread as "Ready for Committer". Either wait a
bit for more feedback on this topic, or just go ahead with either
solution. We can leave it as a semi-open item for reconsideration later.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melih Mutlu 2023-01-30 10:49:34 Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-01-30 10:46:06 Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl