Re: CREATE TEMP TABLE AS SELECT/ GET DIAGNOSTICS ROW_COUNT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: MLikharev(at)micropat(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CREATE TEMP TABLE AS SELECT/ GET DIAGNOSTICS ROW_COUNT
Date: 2005-05-30 21:06:00
Message-ID: 26889.1117487160@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can someone in the community comment on this question? I don't know the
> answer.

I think it could be changed back without much work, but I have a feeling
that we'd deliberately decided on the change of behavior. Can anyone
recall a prior discussion, or want to vote with or against MLikharev?

Note that the change is actually at the SPI level, and would affect
SPI_processed for all code using CREATE AS/SELECT INTO through SPI,
not only plpgsql.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-30 21:08:23 Re: [HACKERS] Inherited constraints and search paths (was
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-30 20:58:43 Re: numeric precision when raising one numeric to