Re: pl/pgsql breakage in 8.1b4?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql breakage in 8.1b4?
Date: 2005-10-28 05:03:33
Message-ID: 26884.1130475813@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com> writes:
> Hmmm... is it feasible to make the error message a little more useful?
> People who didn't use the old-style positional parameters might not
> understand where $1 and $2 are coming from.

Not sure how --- the arm's-length relationship between plpgsql and the
main parser hurts us here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2005-10-28 05:37:32 Re: SOLVED Re: _penalty gist method invoked with one key
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-28 04:58:30 Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", File: "nbtsearch.c", Line: 89)