Re: Release notes on "reserved OIDs"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Release notes on "reserved OIDs"
Date: 2019-09-04 15:11:23
Message-ID: 2687.1567609883@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2019-09-04 09:41:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> As things stand after a6417078c, the safest place for a fork to put
>> private OIDs is actually from 7999 down; patches shouldn't touch that
>> range, and it'll be a long time till we hit it working up.

> Should we just update the comment to reference that then?

WFM.

I'm planning to make a pass over the release notes soon, and will
update this one when I get to it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2019-09-04 15:54:39 Re: Release notes on "reserved OIDs"
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-09-04 15:00:05 Re: Release notes on "reserved OIDs"