Re: LIMIT Optimization

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "alexandre paes :: aldeia digital" <alepaes(at)aldeiadigital(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LIMIT Optimization
Date: 2002-01-25 17:58:16
Message-ID: 26850.1011981496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> So, it is only valuable for cursors

Right; I can see no rhyme or reason for attaching it to a plain SELECT,
unless the system provides some way of stopping short of fetching all of
a SELECT, which we don't. A CURSOR would be the analogous thing in PG.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2002-01-25 18:10:47 Re: Arrays Question
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-25 17:54:57 Re: LIMIT Optimization