From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> |
Cc: | Horák Daniel <horak(at)sit(dot)plzen-city(dot)cz>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch |
Date: | 2001-01-16 05:04:57 |
Message-ID: | 2685.979621497@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> writes:
>> (b) socket file present but no postmaster attached ---
>> you can get that by kill -9'ing the postmaster ...
> Unfortunately, case b causes psql to hang. Using gdb, I was able to
> trace that psql hangs calling select() in pqWait() (i.e.,
> src/interfaces/libpq/fe-misc.c line 739).
> I'm pretty sure that this is Cygwin bug. I will try to formulate
> a minimal test for submission to the Cygwin list but I'm not that
> experienced with sockets. Would anyone like to assist me with this
> endeavor?
You should be able to do something like just creating an unconnected
socket file and then trying to cat(1) from it ...
> I will hold off submitting the patch until this is fixed.
That might be an overreaction --- this does sound like a Cygwin bug
that should be reported and fixed, but the scenario won't happen in
normal operations. Furthermore, if we wait for a confirmed Cygwin
fix, we'll likely miss the 7.1 release. I'd suggest going ahead and
enabling AF_UNIX socket support for Cygwin; worst case is that we
warn people to be wary of it in Cygwin versions < something-or-other.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-16 06:45:21 | Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems |
Previous Message | Jason Tishler | 2001-01-16 04:37:55 | Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems |