| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: sepgsql and materialized views |
| Date: | 2013-07-05 20:40:47 |
| Message-ID: | 26843.1373056847@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:51:40PM +0100, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>> I'll have a discussion about new materialized_view object class
>> on selinux list soon, then I'll submit a patch towards contrib/sepgsql
>> according to the consensus here.
> Has this progressed?
> Should we consider this a 9.3 release blocker? sepgsql already has a red box
> warning about its limitations, so adding the limitation that materialized
> views are unrestricted wouldn't be out of the question.
Definitely -1 for considering it a release blocker. If KaiGai-san can
come up with a fix before we otherwise would release 9.3, that's great,
but there's no way that sepgsql has a large enough user community to
justify letting it determine the release schedule.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2013-07-05 21:33:40 | Re: Request for Patch Feedback: Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2013-07-05 20:39:16 | Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List |