| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq compression |
| Date: | 2012-06-20 15:34:25 |
| Message-ID: | 26825.1340206465@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> writes:
> I wonder though if shouldn't restrict the allowed ciphers list to being
> a simple list of supported ciphers. If our goal is to support multiple
> SSL libraries transparently then surely having openssl-specific syntax
> in the config file isn't exactly great anyway...
No, we don't want to go there, because then we'd have to worry about
keeping the default list in sync with what's supported by the particular
version of the particular library we chance to be using. That's about
as far from transparent as you can get. A notation like "DEFAULT"
is really quite ideal for our purposes in that respect.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-06-20 15:34:42 | Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-06-20 15:25:30 | Re: Pg default's verbosity? |