Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Date: 2010-09-17 21:01:44
Message-ID: 26821.1284757304@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

BTW, on the cleanup steps:

# Remove bogus branches
git branch -D unlabeled-1.44.2
git branch -D unlabeled-1.51.2
git branch -D unlabeled-1.59.2
git branch -D unlabeled-1.87.2
git branch -D unlabeled-1.90.2

You should not need any of the above; I don't see those being generated
anymore with the cleanup script in place.

git branch -D ecpg_big_bison

I don't agree with removing this. It is a legitimate part of the
project history. Yeah, it was a workaround, but we've had workarounds
in place for other broken software.

# Remove broken tags
git tag -d SUPPORT
git tag -d MANUAL_1_0
git tag -d Release-1-6-0

Also get rid of the "creation" tag, please. Also, just for the record,
these aren't really broken. Maybe "Remove unwanted partial tags"?

In addition to the above, we're going to want to clean up the
Release_2_0_0 and Release_2_0 tags, but I'm not sure if there's
a reasonable way to script those when the commit SHA1's aren't frozen
yet. I can give you timestamps for the commits they should point at,
but I lack the git-fu to convert that into a git tag command.

Similarly, we're going to want to repoint REL6_5, REL7_1, REL7_1_2
tags at more appropriate places, but right now all I have for those is
timestamps. (I've also identified places to tag the other early
releases, but those tags can certainly be added later.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-09-17 21:02:30 compile/install of git
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-09-17 20:50:43 Re: Progress indication prototype

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-09-17 21:04:27 Re: error on http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Lock_Monitoring
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-09-17 20:48:43 Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion