Re: killing process question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Johnson, Shaunn" <SJohnson6(at)bcbsm(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: killing process question
Date: 2002-09-19 16:41:10
Message-ID: 26819.1032453670@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Johnson, Shaunn" <SJohnson6(at)bcbsm(dot)com> writes:
> --that's just it: it's not doing a lot of anything.
> --not munching on CPU cycles or anything like that.
> --'ps auwx' shows that the process is stopped
> --(displays a 'T' in the line, i. e.:)

> [snip]
> postgres 3488 5.3 0.0 11412 4 pts/4 T Sep18 88:53 postgres: joe
> testdb 16.xx.xx.xx SELECT
> [/snip]

Interesting. Maybe it's waiting for a lock that someone else has?

Can you attach to the process with gdb and get a stack trace to show
where it is, exactly?

$ gdb /path/to/postgres-executable
gdb> attach 3488
gdb> bt
gdb> quit
okay to detach? y

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Elielson Fontanezi 2002-09-19 16:52:31 PHP + PostgreSQL
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-09-19 16:37:09 Re: [HACKERS] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?