Re: poor performance on 7.1 vs 7.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kyle <kaf(at)nwlink(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: poor performance on 7.1 vs 7.0
Date: 2001-05-08 02:48:04
Message-ID: 26818.989290084@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Kyle <kaf(at)nwlink(dot)com> writes:
> I'm getting poor performance on 7.1 as compared to 7.0.

Hm. I don't know why 7.1 might be slower for plain SELECTs (the WAL
changes would certainly not affect that). Could you compile 7.1 for
profiling ("make clean; make PROFILE=-pg all" in the src/backend
subdirectory should do it) and send along a gprof table for your
test run?

> I've got a btree index on the first 16 of the data elements, and
> explain verifies that the index is used.

Simple explain doesn't prove that the index is being fully used ---
the display doesn't distinguish how many index columns are actually
being looked at. EXPLAIN VERBOSE output would resolve that doubt.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve O'Hagan 2001-05-08 03:36:47 Re: ACCESS2k -> postgres via ODBC
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-08 02:34:55 Re: select off of a view going slowly