From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Import from Linux to |
Date: | 2004-08-14 03:55:14 |
Message-ID: | 2681.24.211.141.25.1092455714.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane said:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Should it be backported for the upcoming stable release(s)? Bruce and
>> I were discussing this earlier.
>
> Probably a good idea, since we do support psql on Windows even in the
> older releases.
>
> My personal opinion is to back-port only as far as 7.4, but if you feel
> like doing and testing it for 7.3 then I'll apply the patch. I need it
> tomorrow (Sat) though, as I'd like to wrap these releases Sunday.
>
No, I think 7.4 should do. 7.3 users will still have the dos2unix workaround
available. Are you going to do the 7.4 patch, or do you need me to? I
normally only keep a HEAD tree checked out. A quick look at the cvsweb diffs
suggests the patch should apply cleanly but with different line offsets.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-08-14 04:23:14 | Re: Pseudo-Off-topic-survey: Opinions about future of Postgresql(MySQL)? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-14 03:51:48 | Re: [Fwd: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Import from Linux to |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Serguei Mokhov | 2004-08-14 06:20:05 | Translation updates for 8.0: initdb-ru, psql-ru |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-14 03:51:48 | Re: [Fwd: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Import from Linux to |