Re: cvs checkout pgsql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cvs checkout pgsql
Date: 2002-08-02 04:07:41
Message-ID: 26786.1028261261@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>> Well, it did work before, and I'd really like it to work again. I do
>> not want to think about how Marc's broken apart the distribution when
>> I'm looking at my local tree, and I don't want to think about it when
>> I'm looking at cvsweb either.

> You don't have to think about anything ... god, does *nobody* read what
> they are replying to??

> if you do a cvs checkout of pgsql, you will get exactly what you are used
> to ...

Yes, I did a re-checkout, remerge of the rather large patch I'm working
on, rebuild, etc. I've more or less recovered here, after wasting an
hour or two that I had other uses for. But cvsweb is still broken:
there is AFAICT no page that presents a unified view of the CVS tree
anymore. If it's merely moved, how about telling me where?

I quite concur with Peter's remarks: some discussion of this sort of
change would have been appropriate in advance, rather than after.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-02 04:23:25 Re: getpid() function
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-08-02 03:39:18 Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?