From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: cvs checkout pgsql |
Date: | 2002-08-02 04:07:41 |
Message-ID: | 26786.1028261261@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>> Well, it did work before, and I'd really like it to work again. I do
>> not want to think about how Marc's broken apart the distribution when
>> I'm looking at my local tree, and I don't want to think about it when
>> I'm looking at cvsweb either.
> You don't have to think about anything ... god, does *nobody* read what
> they are replying to??
> if you do a cvs checkout of pgsql, you will get exactly what you are used
> to ...
Yes, I did a re-checkout, remerge of the rather large patch I'm working
on, rebuild, etc. I've more or less recovered here, after wasting an
hour or two that I had other uses for. But cvsweb is still broken:
there is AFAICT no page that presents a unified view of the CVS tree
anymore. If it's merely moved, how about telling me where?
I quite concur with Peter's remarks: some discussion of this sort of
change would have been appropriate in advance, rather than after.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-02 04:23:25 | Re: getpid() function |
Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-08-02 03:39:18 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |