Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Larry McGhaw" <lmcghaw(at)connx(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.
Date: 2007-06-11 22:40:38
Message-ID: 26776.1181601638@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> writes:
> These two calls make our remote queries via libpq about twice as fast on
> average.

And, perhaps, cause even greater factors of degradation in other
scenarios (not to mention the possibility of complete failure on some
platforms). You haven't provided nearly enough evidence that this is
a safe change to make.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-06-11 22:43:37 Re: Selecting a constant question
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2007-06-11 22:39:49 Re: Selecting a constant question