Re: Numeric 508 datatype

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Date: 2005-11-17 16:20:50
Message-ID: 26770.1132244450@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> However, I don't think we can promise never to change the ondisk
> representation of data, nor the page layout. Sometimes an inplace
> upgrade just won't work, ISTM.

We have talked about batching on-disk changes so that they'd only occur
once every few release cycles. But until we have a pg_upgrade, there is
no reason to adopt such a policy.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-11-17 16:28:35 Re: Very slow queries on 8.1
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-11-17 16:13:06 Re: Numeric 508 datatype

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-11-17 16:59:43 Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-11-17 16:13:06 Re: Numeric 508 datatype

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-11-17 16:59:43 Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-11-17 16:13:06 Re: Numeric 508 datatype