From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
Date: | 2005-11-17 16:20:50 |
Message-ID: | 26770.1132244450@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> However, I don't think we can promise never to change the ondisk
> representation of data, nor the page layout. Sometimes an inplace
> upgrade just won't work, ISTM.
We have talked about batching on-disk changes so that they'd only occur
once every few release cycles. But until we have a pg_upgrade, there is
no reason to adopt such a policy.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-17 16:28:35 | Re: Very slow queries on 8.1 |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-11-17 16:13:06 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-11-17 16:59:43 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-11-17 16:13:06 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-11-17 16:59:43 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-11-17 16:13:06 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |