Re: More time zones

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More time zones
Date: 2002-02-26 03:22:55
Message-ID: 26770.1014693775@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> One concern I have about the time zone abbreviation database is that the
> inflation of possible choices makes any kind of error checking mostly
> non-existant.

That's overstated, but it's a good point nonetheless. We had a report
of one missing timezone entry (or was it two?). Not sure that that
should prompt us to add a hundred entries of dubious validity to the
keyword list.

Perhaps we could find some middle ground between a hard-wired list and
looking up TZ entries in a fully dynamic system table. The list of
known timezones seems like something we could read from a flat text
configuration file at startup --- wouldn't that be enough
configurability?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-02-26 03:38:52 Re: More time zones
Previous Message Arguile 2002-02-26 03:11:02 Timezone Inconsistancies