| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: stderr & win32 admin check |
| Date: | 2004-06-15 22:51:56 |
| Message-ID: | 2673.24.211.141.25.1087339916.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane said:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So? I don't follow why "run it as a service" isn't a sufficient
>>> answer, and indeed the preferred way to do it.
>
>> We don't know what the usage pattern is going to be on Windows - I
>> think we need to keep it as flexible as possible consistent with good
>> security.
>
> Sure, but I draw the line at running Postgres with admin privileges.
> "Flexibility is more important than security" is exactly the mindset
> that has gotten Microsoft into their current bed of nails.
>
That would be the reason for my qualifying phrase "consistent with good
security". :-)
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-06-15 22:53:50 | Re: stderr & win32 admin check |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-06-15 22:48:09 | Re: stderr & win32 admin check |