| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
| Date: | 2007-05-03 05:30:39 |
| Message-ID: | 26720.1178170239@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> You keep saying that but I think it's wrong. There are trivial patches that
> were submitted last year that are still sitting in the queue.
Um ... which ones exactly? I don't see *anything* in the current queue
that is utterly without issues, other than Heikki's ReadOrZeroBuffer
patch which certainly doesn't date from last year (and besides, has
now been applied).
I'm a bit more worried about stuff that may have slid through the
cracks, like the Darwin SysV-vs-Posix-semaphores patch that I complained
of in my triage listing. But the stuff that is listed on Bruce's patch
queue page is not "trivial". It's either large or has got problems.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-03 05:33:59 | Re: Heap page diagnostic functions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-03 05:24:45 | Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-05-03 11:31:26 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-05-02 20:32:19 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |