Re: more i18n/l10n issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: more i18n/l10n issues
Date: 2003-09-29 17:56:11
Message-ID: 26714.1064858171@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I have been wondering if moving to XML for config files might be a good
> idea - and if there are going to be GUIs that write them that gives some
> more impetus to the idea.

> Or would it be overkill?

Seems like overkill. What would it buy us, other than making it a lot
more painful to edit the config files manually?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-09-29 17:59:09 Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-09-29 17:55:57 Re: Alter Table Column Datatype