Re: missing COMMENT ON objects

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: missing COMMENT ON objects
Date: 2003-10-06 14:00:27
Message-ID: 26704.1065448827@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I notice you cannot COMMENT ON the following:
> * Cast
> * Conversion
> * Operator class
> Is that a deliberate omission, or is it an oversight?

Unimplemented feature AFAIR. BTW, if you feel like doing something
about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT <oid> would be good too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-10-06 14:25:35 Re: more on initdb
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-06 13:57:17 Re: Missing error condition in CREATE TABLE