From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)mksoft(dot)nu> |
Cc: | pawel(at)freebsd(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14643: Fails to compile with LibreSSL >= 2.5.3 |
Date: | 2017-05-04 19:55:26 |
Message-ID: | 26697.1493927726@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
=?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?= <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)mksoft(dot)nu> writes:
> On 2017-05-04 21:35, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm guessing that Pawel is working with a bleeding-edge LibreSSL that
>> has adopted API changes similar to OpenSSL 1.1.0. The question now
>> is whether they're similar enough that our current code will work.
>> As I said, it'd be nice to find out this week not next week ...
> There is a libressl-devel-2.5.2 available in the packages system that I
> could try and switch to if you want? Don't know if that is new enough
> for matching OpenSSL 1.1.0 API-changes though.
Pawel specifies in $subject that you need 2.5.3 or later; if that's
accurate, 2.5.2 wouldn't show the problem.
In any case, if loach is still representative of what a lot of FreeBSD
people would be running, I'd counsel leaving it alone. Perhaps somebody
could set up another buildfarm animal with latest-n-greatest LibreSSL.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2017-05-04 20:03:17 | Re: BUG #14643: Fails to compile with LibreSSL >= 2.5.3 |
Previous Message | Mikael Kjellström | 2017-05-04 19:42:34 | Re: BUG #14643: Fails to compile with LibreSSL >= 2.5.3 |