Re: Recursive unions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recursive unions
Date: 2003-01-29 15:58:19
Message-ID: 26693.1043855899@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> What was the result of the recursive unions thread? I remember Tom maybe
> saying that the Redhat guys like the DB2 (SQL99) syntax the best, however
> was it said that that was going to be done by Redhat for 7.4?

It'll be looked at; whether it will be done in time for 7.4 is anyone's guess.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-01-29 16:00:37 Re: Specifying Rowtypes
Previous Message Francisco J Reyes 2003-01-29 15:20:07 Re: list server problems?