=?iso-8859-15?q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= <cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I just wonder about this statement that you removed:
> * Since we don't want to encourage heavy use of those functions,
> * it seems OK to put a pretty small maximum limit on the number of
> * simultaneously allocated descs.
> Is it now encouraged to use those functions, or at least that it seems less
> 'scary' than in the past ?
Well, we could put back some weaker form of the statement, but I wasn't
sure how to word it.
regards, tom lane