Re: Question about non-blocking mode in libpq

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question about non-blocking mode in libpq
Date: 2023-11-01 01:11:06
Message-ID: 2666892.1698801066@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Okay, I added "_successful_ calls", attached. I am not sure what else
> to add.

What I'm objecting to is removal of the bit about "if they need to be
called again". That provides a hint that retry is the appropriate
response to a failure. Admittedly, it's not 100% clear, but your
version makes it 0% clear.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2023-11-01 01:55:49 Re: Question about non-blocking mode in libpq
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-11-01 01:07:11 Re: EXCLUDE COLLATE in CREATE/ALTER TABLE document