Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Date: 2011-02-12 23:37:53
Message-ID: 26667.1297553873@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Feb 12, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm. I think we'd still have to disallow dash as the first or last
>> character in a version name to make that unambiguous. Not sure it's
>> worth the trouble.

> How likely is *that*?

Not very, but the rules are getting a bit complicated ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-02-12 23:38:53 Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2011-02-12 23:34:13 Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling