| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Interval month, week -> day |
| Date: | 2006-09-01 00:32:28 |
| Message-ID: | 26641.1157070748@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> writes:
> On Sep 1, 2006, at 9:12 , Tom Lane wrote:
>> I agree that this seems like an oversight in the original
>> months/days/seconds patch, rather than behavior we want to keep.
>> But is DecodeInterval the only place with the problem?
> I'll check on this tonight. Any idea where I might start to look?
I'd look at the input routines for all the datetime types and see where
they go. It's entirely possible that DecodeInterval is the only place
with the problem, but I'd not assume that without looking.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2006-09-01 00:55:11 | Re: Status on Fedora Core Extras packaging |
| Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2006-09-01 00:16:28 | Re: Interval month, week -> day |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-01 02:03:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure |
| Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2006-09-01 00:16:28 | Re: Interval month, week -> day |