Re: 9.0.15 WAL mis-replay status?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ray Stell <stellr(at)vt(dot)edu>
Cc: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.0.15 WAL mis-replay status?
Date: 2014-04-28 20:25:00
Message-ID: 26635.1398716700@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Ray Stell <stellr(at)vt(dot)edu> writes:
> On Apr 28, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Note however that the issue could only arise on tables that exceed 1GB

> I assume this is true also for other relkinds? I have >1G indexes here, but tables are <1G. TIA.

Right, such indexes would be at risk. However, if it's only the indexes
that exceed 1G, you could consider reindexing those indexes as an
alternative to a full resync.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Evan Walter 2014-04-28 20:39:30 getting a error message when creating temporary table
Previous Message Ray Stell 2014-04-28 19:41:23 Re: 9.0.15 WAL mis-replay status?