| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use" |
| Date: | 2019-05-09 13:47:34 |
| Message-ID: | 2663.1557409654@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 02:32:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Just now, while running a parallel check-world on HEAD according to the
>> same script I've been using for quite some time, one of the TAP tests
>> died during initdb:
>> performing post-bootstrap initialization ... 2019-05-08 13:59:19.963 EDT [18351] FATAL: pre-existing shared memory block (key 5440004, ID 1734475802) is still in use
> The odds are very high that you would not have gotten that error before that
> commit. But if the cause matches your guess, it's not something wrong with
> the commit ...
Fair point.
> What OS, OS version, and filesystem?
Up-to-date RHEL6 (kernel 2.6.32-754.12.1.el6.x86_64), ext4 over LVM
on spinning rust with an LSI MegaRAID controller in front of it.
Since complaining, I've done half a dozen more parallel check-worlds
without issue, so the error was and still is rare. This matches the
fact that we've not seen it in the buildfarm :-(.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-05-09 14:20:17 | Re: Fuzzy thinking in is_publishable_class |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-05-09 13:41:16 | Re: Fuzzy thinking in is_publishable_class |