Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Yeah, I think that the underscore variants got added because of cases
> like ours where printf is sometimes defined as a macro. I'll just need
> to make sure that this gets set before there's any possibility of that
> happening.
The existing code would already be broken if that were the case,
so I see no need to worry.
regards, tom lane