Re: BUG #4551: Implementation of the "line" type..

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Barry Sanford" <barry(dot)sanford(at)trimjoist(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BUG #4551: Implementation of the "line" type..
Date: 2008-11-28 16:27:34
Message-ID: 26566.1227889654@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> No really, the built-in geometry types are considered kind of legacy. If you
> want to deal with something more modern, you may want to look into PostGIS.

Or, if you want to fix them, feel free to submit a patch. But there is
no one among the current group of developers who seems to have any
interest in re-implementing those types.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message minnesota_alex 2008-11-28 18:36:31 BUG #4552: password
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-11-28 14:57:55 Re: BUG #4551: Implementation of the "line" type..