| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jesse Morris <jmorris(at)coverity(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable" |
| Date: | 2009-10-21 13:07:42 |
| Message-ID: | 26564.1256130462@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> This function call is adding the new access control entry to the DACL,
> and in Jesse's modified version it's specifying that the ACE should be
> inheritable.
Hah, so now we have a theory.
> The other refactoring is still important however - without it, I still
> see the error. I would guess that you cannot add an inheritable ACE
> once the process has been created, but I cannot say for certain.
That would make sense if the state gets copied to the process at time
of creation. Okay, I'm satisfied that this is a believable patch...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-10-21 14:02:15 | Re: Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable" |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-10-21 11:52:54 | Re: Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable" |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-10-21 13:08:23 | Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql |
| Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2009-10-21 12:38:09 | Re: \du quite ugly in 8.4 |