| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Migration to PGLister - After |
| Date: | 2017-11-13 22:09:42 |
| Message-ID: | 2654.1510610982@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj> writes:
> The removal of the [HACKERS] (etc) header will be frustrating for me: I do
> not sort mailing lists into folders (I simply scan the "Forums" autofilter
> in gmail) and have no wish to do so, and there is no way to make such a
> machine-readable header visible in gmail.
I'm told it's actually very easy to handle this in gmail: set up a filter
that recognizes list messages (make it key on the List-ID header) and then
tags them with an appropriate label.
We should put detailed instructions about how to do that on the wiki page
about the migration, but not being a gmail user I can't provide exact
instructions.
> Perhaps those users who wish to use DKIM on their email to the list could
> be persuaded to remove the Subject line from list of optional fields to be
> signed for list email?
As Stephen mentioned, there are no good solutions that would allow us to
keep mangling subject headers. This has been debated extensively already.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-13 22:26:22 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade to clusters with a different WAL segment size |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-13 21:56:59 | Re: Fix number skipping in to_number |