From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Naming of new EXCLUDE constraints |
Date: | 2010-04-13 06:15:25 |
Message-ID: | 26516.1271139325@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Fine, then we will just have to live with "exclusion constraints" and
>> "contraint exclusion".
> I am not necessarily 100% averse to changing it... just saying that it
> shouldn't be done unless we have a clear consensus to overrule the
> previous consensus.
Well, I'm completely unimpressed with the proposed text, which includes
phrases like "uniqueness and exclude constraints". That leaves nothing
but the impression that these people don't speak the English too good.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-04-13 08:16:09 | pgsql: Only try to do a graceful disconnect if we've successfully loaded |
Previous Message | User Bschwarz | 2010-04-13 03:36:50 | pgtcl - libpgtcl: * Changed direct struct access to errorLine to the Tcl |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-13 07:09:01 | Re: debugger question |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2010-04-13 06:12:45 | Re: testing hot standby |