From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com>, Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MOVE |
Date: | 2005-01-14 21:55:47 |
Message-ID: | 26502.1105739747@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Why not just do it in a single transaction? I don't think you need to
> use SERIALIZABLE at all, I think normal read-committed mode will do
> what you want, no?
> BEGIN;
> INSERT INTO archive (...) SELECT ... FROM active WHERE user_id = ...;
> DELETE FROM active WHERE user_id = ...;
> COMMIT;
No, that's exactly wrong: in read-committed mode the DELETE could delete
rows that were not seen by the SELECT. It would work in serializable
mode though.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Frank D. Engel, Jr. | 2005-01-14 21:59:57 | Re: Parsing of backslash in statements via ODBC |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-14 21:43:14 | Re: Parsing of backslash in statements via ODBC |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Benjamin Arai | 2005-01-14 22:51:05 | PostgreSQL Specification |
Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2005-01-14 21:54:02 | Re: Time span conversion function |