From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Benchmarks) |
Date: | 2003-02-11 17:18:10 |
Message-ID: | 26500.1044983890@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Personally I'd be a bunch happier if we set the buffers so high that we
> definitely have decent performance, and the people that want to run
> PostgreSQL are forced to make the choice of either:
> 1) Adjust their system settings to allow PostgreSQL to run properly, or
> 2) Manually adjust the PostgreSQL settings to run memory-constrained
> This way, PostgreSQL either runs decently, or they are _aware_ that
> they're limiting it.
Yeah, that is the subtext here. If you can't increase SHMMAX then you
can always trim the postgresql.conf parameters --- but theoretically,
at least, you should then have a clue that you're running a
badly-configured setup ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-02-11 17:18:48 | Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: |
Previous Message | mlw | 2003-02-11 17:12:04 | Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-02-11 17:18:48 | Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: |
Previous Message | mlw | 2003-02-11 17:12:04 | Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-02-11 17:18:48 | Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: |
Previous Message | mlw | 2003-02-11 17:12:04 | Re: Changing the default configuration (was Re: |