Re: git: uh-oh

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Haggerty <mhagger(at)alum(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh
Date: 2010-09-06 14:01:46
Message-ID: 26469.1283781706@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 15:37, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Uh, no, not so. Marc used to use that ID for commits related to
>> pushing new versions. It's been retired, but there's nothing un-real
>> about the commits under that ID. Please pick something else. I thought
>> the suggestion of cvs2git was a good one.

> Ok, I'll switch to that - no problem. Should the name really be
> "PostgreSQL Daemon" then? (Because that's what it's called on the cvs
> box, but that's probably just a coincidence)

That seems to be the name that shows up in the pgsql-committers
archives, so I'd say we should stick with it. We're not in the business
of redefining history here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-09-06 14:04:07 Re: string function - "format" function proposal
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-09-06 13:52:26 Re: git: uh-oh