| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh) |
| Date: | 2000-11-02 19:28:27 |
| Message-ID: | 26459.973193307@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I think the issue is that we don't want to risk breaking pg_dumpall in a
> minor release.
No we don't, but I agree with Peter that pg_dumpall is the place for
this feature in the long run. A separate contrib script is not going
to get maintained.
What I want to know is why we are adding features at all in a minor
release. Especially 24 or so hours before release, when there is
certainly no time for any testing worthy of the name. Contrib or no
contrib, I think this is a bad idea and a bad precedent.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-11-02 19:30:44 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh) |
| Previous Message | momjian | 2000-11-02 19:26:51 | pgsql/src/tools (pgcvslog) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-11-02 19:30:44 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh) |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-11-02 19:25:36 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (MakefileREADME pg_dumpaccounts.sh) |