| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: observations about temporary tables and schemas |
| Date: | 2003-09-16 19:32:03 |
| Message-ID: | 26433.1063740723@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
> ... In this case, I think the
> SQL spec was not thought out very well.
Many people think that about a lot of aspects of the spec ;-)
> I did not see a TODO item regarding global temporary tables...has this
> been attempted/done?
We concluded in the last discussion of this subject that our existing
temp table behavior actually approaches the spec's GLOBAL TEMP behavior
more nearly than it does LOCAL TEMP; but in any case, without modules
the difference is moot. Accordingly, 7.4 will accept either syntax,
and there is no more TODO. See the archives from a few months back, or
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-createtable.html#SQL-CREATETABLE-COMPATIBILITY
which distills that discussion.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-16 19:38:23 | Re: Compiling HP-UX 10.20 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera Munoz | 2003-09-16 19:26:20 | Re: Compiling HP-UX 10.20 |