Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Win32 port list" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Date: 2004-11-01 21:39:42
Message-ID: 26430.1099345182@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> I was also hoping to piggyback the socket fix on top of this
> infrastructure. And that *requires* the write-files-after-createprocess
> method. There is no other way.

Oh, I had forgotten about that part of the problem. Okay, just gotta
hold our noses and do it I guess.

(Just to be clear: the plan is CreateProcess in suspended state, then
write_backend_variables, then start the child's thread, right?
Otherwise seems you got a race condition.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-11-01 21:42:25 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2004-11-01 21:21:41 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-11-01 21:42:25 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Previous Message Tim Penhey 2004-11-01 21:35:08 Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.0-beta4 Windows 2000 Installation