From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Nick Fankhauser" <nickf(at)doxpop(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Specific questions about wraparound and vacuum |
Date: | 2007-08-08 16:34:04 |
Message-ID: | 2643.1186590844@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
"Nick Fankhauser" <nickf(at)doxpop(dot)com> writes:
> 1) Do we need to do a *full* vacuum or just a "lazy" vacuum to take care of
> the xid wraparound issues?
Lazy is sufficient --- as long as it's database-wide including the
system catalogs (which means a superuser has to do it).
> Or... is it the case that by one billion, the docs really mean 2^30
> (1073741824) ?
2^30. You appear to have executed a bit under 600000 transactions since
vacuuming, so if that's three hours then you've got about 5000 hours
until wraparound.
> 4) The documentation implies that I need to vacuum *every* database, even if
> I'm not using them all, so I vacuumed template1, but can't connect to
> template0. Do I really need to vacuum databases where no transactions are
> occurring? If so, how to I deal with template0?
You don't need to touch frozen databases. This was discussed yesterday ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas | 2007-08-08 18:00:34 | Re: ssl and odbc standar driver |
Previous Message | Stefan Zweig | 2007-08-08 16:25:58 | use replication on a database only on selected schemes? |