"Daniel Cristian Cruz" <danielcristian(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2007/3/28, chris smith <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>> Total runtime: 13.844 ms
>>
>> Why bother?
> Because faster could be better in a very busy system.
If you are concerned about global performance improvement, quit worrying
about this micro-detail and get yourself onto a more modern Postgres.
regards, tom lane